Top Tips

Adventures of a bridge professional

Adventures of a bridge professional.
Columns by Dutch National Team player Sjoert Brink. Check out the section Columns

Disasters
Reading about blunders others make is great fun. On this page you find a collection of those blunders and other disasters in bridge. Enjoy them like we did, knowing very well we all are more than capable of making the same type of mistakes...


Oops...**

During the round robin of the 1985 World Team Championships (contesting the Bermuda Bowl) Canada played Bermuda. The latter team wasn't one of the favourites (to put it mildly).
The following deal turned out to be a nightmare for the Bermudian South — whose name wasn't mentioned in the original report; sadly enough it is common practice in bridge 'journalism' not to mention the name of a player who makes a mistake... Anyway, because of this deal he probably lost a lot of sleep over many years. Sometimes one wishes that one could go back in time in order to do better. This certainly was such a case.
This was South's hand:

S/NS
 
A Q 3 
A K Q 5 
3 
K J 10 6 5 

WestNorthEastSouth
GuptaBermudian 1 CannellBermudian 2
11
52double3pass??

1 Artificial, 16+ HCP, any distribution
2 Transfer to diamonds
3 Showing some values, not a penalty double (though South is of course free to pass)

True: South could pass. But West would bid 5 then and if North passed, South would have the same bidding problem. And if North doubled after some hesitation, South probably couldn't pull the double in view of ethics. So South did best by deciding now whether he wanted to defend or try for a slam.
This South player thought along these lines and didn't like any fuzz. He liked to get on with it. He realised that West had disclosed that North very probably had little or no strength in diamonds. So all face cards that North did have, were valuable ones.
And thus, hoping that North had at least three clubs, South bid 6.

This was followed by three passes and West lead the 4. Dummy was a dream come true:

Read on
 
How strong is that 1NT reply? *

The 2001 final of the Dutch Meesterklasse ('Master League', the top league) for teams.

Modalfa (Amsterdam) plays De Lombard (Rotterdam), contesting the Dutch championship. Any Amsterdam-Rotterdam encounter is characterised by intense rivalry, like Ajax - Feyenoord at football (soccer).
Noteworthy is that in that year's final all of the contesting partnerships were new: none of them had been playing in the Master League for longer than a year. Perhaps that is what caused the disaster below (by the way: Muller — De Wijs, to name one of the pairs, still play as a pair today, in 2010; so maybe some things have changed.)

Read on
 
A less successful penalty double *

forresterThe 1989 European Championships in Turku, Finland, Great-Britain vs. Austria.

Englishman Tony Forrester (photo), then already a world class player (he still is, so he is at the top for decades now), deliberately underbid, giving the opponents all the rope they needed to hang themselves.
Of course, with hindsight it is easy to say that the opponent in question should have known better. But it is the hallmark of the real crack to recognise opportunities in which he can make life miserable for his opponents.

Read on
 
East feels she can beat 7♦...

The 1989 Women's World Championship Teams (contesting the Venice Cup) in Perth; Australia, the USA vs. the Netherlands. On the deal below, something goes seriously wrong on the Dutch side.
But then an American player glitches and saves the Dutch women:

E/NS
 
 A 7
K 5 2
A K Q 8 6 5 4 3
10 9 4windroosK 8 7 6 5 2
K 9 8 6 5 4J
8 4Q J 10 6
9 210 7
 A Q J 3 
Q 10 3 2
A 9 7 3
J

WestNorthEastSouth
BetheBakkerGwozdzinskyGielkens
212NT
342pass5
pass73pass7
passpassdouble!7NT
doublepasspasspass
pass   

1 Weak two: six-card suit, 6-10 HCP
2 Meant as control-showing; interpreted by South as 'two suits'
3 Meant to play; interpreted by South as 'choose between the minors' (consistent in view of 2)

Read on
 
I spy with my little eye...

Even top class players are sometimes guilty of it: reasoning from their own hand. The danger in doing so is that a player's defensive play is based on what he can see, but his partner can't. As a consequence 'the other side of the table' can go terribly wrong.
Take a look at how Brad Moss and partner Fred Gitelman allow an unmakable game to be made, when Moss doesn't realise the problem his partner faces.

Read on
 
A disaster? Certainly, but is it a blunder as well?

Allowing declarer to score +680 in 4 while the opponents could have cashed an ace-king in two suits, looks to be a blunder. But is it?

Cap Gemini Tournament, 1998, The Hague. NS are Enri Leufkens and Berry Westra, already then veterans in this prestigious tournament. As a pair their best years were '93-'96, but at this tournament they always perform well. They play against two brothers, Jason and Justin Hackett, nowadays a world famous pair, then at the start of their illustrious carrier. The English pair did very well and finished fourth, despite this disaster against Leufkens − Westra.

N/All9 6 
 J 2
A J 10 9 7 4 2
6 3
A K 10 4 3windroosJ 8 2
10 7 5Q 8 4
38 6 5
Q J 8 7A K 9 4
 Q 7 5 
A K 9 6 3
K Q
10 5 2

WestNorthEastSouth
Jason HackettLeufkensJustin HackettWestra

3pass3
pass4passpass
pass   
Read on