|
EW do not come any further than 1NT, whereas 3NT is an excellent contract. | N/EW | | | | ♠ | K Q 5 4 |  | ♠ | A J 2 | | ♥ | 8 4 3 | ♥ | K Q 6 | | ♦ | 10 9 | ♦ | A J 8 3 | | ♣ | Q 10 6 4 | ♣ | K J 8 |
| West | North | East | South |
|---|
| - | 1♦ | double | pass | | 1♠ | pass | 1NT | pass | | pass | pass | | |
'I thought you showed 12-14 points', says west. 'Would I double then without shortness in diamonds?' east replies. 'You could have ♦Ax or ♦Kx or ♦AQ', says west. Who made the mistake?
Solution West made the mistake. True, east could have doubled on 12-14 points and something like ♦Ax or ♦Kx or ♦AQ. But with such a hand he would have passed west's 1♠ bid! Doubling first and bidding no trump in the second round, like east does, shows 18-19 HCP. A hand too strong therefore for a direct 1NT overcall. The idea behind it is completely logical: west can bid 1♠ on zero points, a 1NT rebid by east on a mere 12-14 would therefore be suicidal. This principle applies in many bidding situations: if a player is too strong for a direct bid, he doubles first and does the bid in question in the next round. Another example: | West | North | East | South |
|---|
| - | 1♣ | double | pass | | 1♥ | pass | 2♠ | pass | | ... | | | |
East shows a hand too strong for a direct 2♠ overcall. On the assumption 1♣ - 2♠ would promise 12-16 points (intermediate jump overcall), east's actual sequence ('via the double') shows 17+ points.
|